Aircraft comparison
Airbus ACJ319neo vs Airbus ACJ320neo
Summary
The Airbus ACJ319neo and the Airbus ACJ320neo are two vip airliners, compared here on the specifications that matter. On the numbers, the Airbus ACJ319neo flies farther (6,750 vs 6,000 nm). Across 1038 benchmark city pairs in this database, the Airbus ACJ319neo reaches more nonstop (917 versus 841). On a route like Santa Monica – Mykonos (6,065 nm), only the Airbus ACJ319neo makes it nonstop (estimated from published range).
Key differences
Range
750nm
11.1% · ACJ319neo ahead
Cruise speed
0kt
0.0% · tie
Max passengers
0
0.0% · tie
Nonstop reach
917 / 841
of 1038 benchmark routes
| Specification | ACJ319neo | ACJ320neo |
|---|---|---|
| Range | 6,750 nm (12,501 km)✓ | 6,000 nm (11,112 km) |
| Max cruise speed | 470 kt (870.4 km/h) | 470 kt (870.4 km/h) |
| Max Mach | 0.82 mach | 0.82 mach |
| Max operating altitude | 41,000 ft (12,496.8 m) | 41,000 ft (12,496.8 m) |
| Max takeoff weight | 168,650 lb (76,498.3 kg) | 174,165 lb (78,999.9 kg) |
| Typical passengers | 8 count | 19 count✓ |
| Max passengers | 25 count | 25 count |
| Powerplant | CFM/Pratt & Whitney LEAP-1A / PW1100G | CFM/Pratt & Whitney LEAP-1A / PW1100G |
| Engines | 2 count | 2 count |
Highlighted cells mark the stronger value per row (direction is per-metric). Route capability is estimated from published range; figures are not booking prices.
On a real route
Santa Monica – Mykonos — 6,065 nm. Only the Airbus ACJ319neo makes this nonstop (estimate).
See the route →