Aircraft comparison
Bombardier Challenger 350 vs Bombardier Challenger 3500
Summary
The Bombardier Challenger 350 and the Bombardier Challenger 3500 are two super-midsize jets, compared here on the specifications that matter. On the numbers, the Bombardier Challenger 3500 flies farther (3,400 vs 3,200 nm). Across 1038 benchmark city pairs in this database, the Bombardier Challenger 3500 reaches more nonstop (430 versus 399). On a route like London – Morristown (3,028 nm), only the Bombardier Challenger 3500 makes it nonstop (estimated from published range).
Key differences
Range
200nm
5.9% · Challenger 3500 ahead
Cruise speed
0kt
0.0% · tie
Cabin height
0.0ft
0.0% · tie
Max passengers
0
0.0% · tie
Nonstop reach
399 / 430
of 1038 benchmark routes
| Specification | Challenger 350 | Challenger 3500 |
|---|---|---|
| Range | 3,200 nm (5,926.4 km) | 3,400 nm (6,296.8 km)✓ |
| Max cruise speed | 470 kt (870.4 km/h) | 470 kt (870.4 km/h) |
| Max operating altitude | 45,000 ft (13,716 m) | 45,000 ft (13,716 m) |
| Max takeoff weight | 40,600 lb (18,415.8 kg) | 40,600 lb (18,415.8 kg) |
| Typical passengers | 9 count | 9 count |
| Max passengers | 10 count | 10 count |
| Cabin length | 25.2 ft (7.68 m) | 25.2 ft (7.68 m) |
| Cabin height | 6.1 ft (1.86 m) | 6.1 ft (1.86 m) |
| Cabin width | 7.2 ft (2.19 m) | 7.2 ft (2.19 m) |
| Baggage volume | 106 cuft (3 m3) | 106 cuft (3 m3) |
| Powerplant | Honeywell HTF7350 | Honeywell HTF7350 |
| Engines | 2 count | 2 count |
| Thrust per engine | 7,323 lbf | 7,323 lbf |
Highlighted cells mark the stronger value per row (direction is per-metric). Route capability is estimated from published range; figures are not booking prices.
On a real route
London – Morristown — 3,028 nm. Only the Bombardier Challenger 3500 makes this nonstop (estimate).
See the route →