Aircraft comparison
Bombardier Challenger 350 vs Gulfstream G200
Summary
The Bombardier Challenger 350 and the Gulfstream G200 are two super-midsize jets, compared here on the specifications that matter. On the numbers, the Gulfstream G200 flies farther (3,400 vs 3,200 nm); the Gulfstream G200 has the taller cabin (6.2 vs 6.1 ft). Across 1038 benchmark city pairs in this database, the Gulfstream G200 reaches more nonstop (430 versus 399). On a route like London – Morristown (3,028 nm), only the Gulfstream G200 makes it nonstop (estimated from published range).
Key differences
Range
200nm
5.9% · G200 ahead
Cruise speed
0kt
0.0% · tie
Cabin height
0.1ft
1.6% · G200 ahead
Max passengers
0
0.0% · tie
Nonstop reach
399 / 430
of 1038 benchmark routes
| Specification | Challenger 350 | G200 |
|---|---|---|
| Range | 3,200 nm (5,926.4 km) | 3,400 nm (6,296.8 km)✓ |
| Max cruise speed | 470 kt (870.4 km/h) | 470 kt (870.4 km/h) |
| Max operating altitude | 45,000 ft (13,716 m) | 45,000 ft (13,716 m) |
| Max takeoff weight | 40,600 lb (18,415.8 kg) | 35,450 lb (16,079.8 kg) |
| Typical passengers | 9 count✓ | 8 count |
| Max passengers | 10 count | 10 count |
| Cabin length | 25.2 ft (7.68 m)✓ | 24.5 ft (7.47 m) |
| Cabin height | 6.1 ft (1.86 m) | 6.2 ft (1.91 m)✓ |
| Cabin width | 7.2 ft (2.19 m) | 7.2 ft (2.19 m) |
| Baggage volume | 106 cuft (3 m3) | 150 cuft (4.25 m3)✓ |
| Powerplant | Honeywell HTF7350 | Pratt & Whitney Canada PW306A |
| Engines | 2 count | 2 count |
| Thrust per engine | 7,323 lbf | 6,040 lbf |
Highlighted cells mark the stronger value per row (direction is per-metric). Route capability is estimated from published range; figures are not booking prices.
On a real route
London – Morristown — 3,028 nm. Only the Gulfstream G200 makes this nonstop (estimate).
See the route →