Aircraft comparison
Dassault Falcon 10X vs Dassault Falcon 8X
Summary
The Dassault Falcon 10X and the Dassault Falcon 8X are two ultra-long-range jets, compared here on the specifications that matter. On the numbers, the Dassault Falcon 10X flies farther (7,500 vs 6,450 nm); the Dassault Falcon 10X carries more (19 vs 16 pax); the Dassault Falcon 10X is faster (493 vs 488 kt). Across 1038 benchmark city pairs in this database, the Dassault Falcon 10X reaches more nonstop (943 versus 883). On a route like Aspen – Riyadh (6,678 nm), only the Dassault Falcon 10X makes it nonstop (estimated from published range).
Key differences
Range
1,050nm
14.0% · Falcon 10X ahead
Cruise speed
5kt
1.0% · Falcon 10X ahead
Cabin height
0.5ft
7.5% · Falcon 10X ahead
Max passengers
3
15.8% · Falcon 10X ahead
Nonstop reach
943 / 883
of 1038 benchmark routes
| Specification | Falcon 10X | Falcon 8X |
|---|---|---|
| Range | 7,500 nm (13,890 km)✓ | 6,450 nm (11,945.4 km) |
| Max cruise speed | 493 kt (913 km/h)✓ | 488 kt (903.8 km/h) |
| Max Mach | 0.925 mach✓ | 0.9 mach |
| Max operating altitude | 51,000 ft (15,544.8 m) | 51,000 ft (15,544.8 m) |
| Max takeoff weight | 115,000 lb (52,163.1 kg) | 73,000 lb (33,112.2 kg) |
| Typical passengers | 12 count | 12 count |
| Max passengers | 19 count✓ | 16 count |
| Cabin length | 53.8 ft (16.4 m)✓ | 42.7 ft (13.01 m) |
| Cabin height | 6.7 ft (2.04 m)✓ | 6.2 ft (1.89 m) |
| Cabin width | 9.1 ft (2.77 m)✓ | 7.7 ft (2.35 m) |
| Baggage volume | 155 cuft (4.39 m3)✓ | 140 cuft (3.96 m3) |
| Powerplant | Rolls-Royce Pearl 10X | Pratt & Whitney Canada PW307D |
| Engines | 2 count | 3 count |
| Thrust per engine | 18,000 lbf | 6,722 lbf |
Highlighted cells mark the stronger value per row (direction is per-metric). Route capability is estimated from published range; figures are not booking prices.
On a real route
Aspen – Riyadh — 6,678 nm. Only the Dassault Falcon 10X makes this nonstop (estimate).
See the route →