Aircraft comparison
Dassault Falcon 10X vs Gulfstream G650
Summary
The Dassault Falcon 10X and the Gulfstream G650 are two ultra-long-range jets, compared here on the specifications that matter. On the numbers, the Dassault Falcon 10X flies farther (7,500 vs 7,000 nm); the Gulfstream G650 is faster (516 vs 493 kt); the Dassault Falcon 10X has the taller cabin (6.7 vs 6.4 ft). Across 1038 benchmark city pairs in this database, the Dassault Falcon 10X reaches more nonstop (943 versus 923). On a route like Aspen – Riyadh (6,678 nm), only the Dassault Falcon 10X makes it nonstop (estimated from published range).
Key differences
Range
500nm
6.7% · Falcon 10X ahead
Cruise speed
23kt
4.5% · G650 ahead
Cabin height
0.3ft
4.5% · Falcon 10X ahead
Max passengers
0
0.0% · tie
Nonstop reach
943 / 923
of 1038 benchmark routes
| Specification | Falcon 10X | G650 |
|---|---|---|
| Range | 7,500 nm (13,890 km)✓ | 7,000 nm (12,964 km) |
| Max cruise speed | 493 kt (913 km/h) | 516 kt (955.6 km/h)✓ |
| Max Mach | 0.925 mach | 0.925 mach |
| Max operating altitude | 51,000 ft (15,544.8 m) | 51,000 ft (15,544.8 m) |
| Max takeoff weight | 115,000 lb (52,163.1 kg) | 99,600 lb (45,177.8 kg) |
| Typical passengers | 12 count | 14 count✓ |
| Max passengers | 19 count | 19 count |
| Cabin length | 53.8 ft (16.4 m)✓ | 46.8 ft (14.26 m) |
| Cabin height | 6.7 ft (2.04 m)✓ | 6.4 ft (1.95 m) |
| Cabin width | 9.1 ft (2.77 m)✓ | 8.5 ft (2.59 m) |
| Baggage volume | 155 cuft (4.39 m3) | 195 cuft (5.52 m3)✓ |
| Powerplant | Rolls-Royce Pearl 10X | Rolls-Royce BR725 |
| Engines | 2 count | 2 count |
| Thrust per engine | 18,000 lbf | 16,900 lbf |
Highlighted cells mark the stronger value per row (direction is per-metric). Route capability is estimated from published range; figures are not booking prices.
On a real route
Aspen – Riyadh — 6,678 nm. Only the Dassault Falcon 10X makes this nonstop (estimate).
See the route →